Customers call, email and chase, and nobody knows who owns the ticket.
One ticket for every request, from a self-service portal or a call, with status and history the customer and the team both see.
Bizmap runs field service for MFI Document Solutions across 18 Sub-Saharan African countries: a customer self-service portal, one-click issue-to-task conversion, region-based technician assignment, a multi-level escalation matrix and SLA alerts. Resolution time fell from 8–10 days to 2–3 days, with more than 46,000 issues and about 52,700 assets tracked in the system.
Customers call, email and chase, and nobody knows who owns the ticket.
One ticket for every request, from a self-service portal or a call, with status and history the customer and the team both see.
Technicians are assigned days late.
Region-based routing and one-click conversion from issue to task, so the nearest technician gets the job the same day.
We miss SLAs and only find out when the customer complains.
SLA alerts and a multi-level escalation matrix that moves a ticket up before the deadline, not after.
We cannot see what a technician actually did on site.
Time tracking with pause and resume, work logs, material requests inside the task and preventive maintenance schedules per asset.
The same six waypoints and three gates as every implementation.
Ticketing, region-based technician dispatch, SLAs, escalation and preventive maintenance on ERPNext, for service teams spread across cities and countries.
No. At MFI it runs on ERPNext's support, task and asset features with custom portal forms, routing and escalation, so tickets, technicians, stock and invoices share one system.
Yes. MFI runs one system across 18 countries, with routing by region and dashboards per region for management.
Yes, through a self-service portal with predefined forms, so the request arrives with the details the technician needs.
An engineer reads it and replies within one working day with questions, not a brochure.